AI picture detection has turn out to be a kind of issues that sounds area of interest till you really want it.
A scholar submits an “authentic” illustration that appears somewhat too clear. A college paper makes use of a photograph that spreads quick and will get questioned later. A trainer desires to confirm whether or not a challenge picture is actual, edited, or generated.
In apply, most individuals aren’t in search of forensic certainty. They’re in search of a dependable sign — and a workflow that doesn’t create extra confusion than it resolves.
This text compares TruthScan and NoteGPT for AI picture detection solely. No AI textual content detection, no summarizers, no research instruments. Simply: “Does this picture look AI-generated or manipulated?”
What’s TruthScan?
TruthScan is an enterprise-grade AI detection platform that features picture detection alongside different media sorts. It markets itself as a high-accuracy system constructed for quantity, audit trails, and investigation-style outputs.

What stands out is the framing. TruthScan doesn’t simply promise a solution. It guarantees proof: visible evaluation, detection heatmaps, and “digital alteration detection” that explicitly contains Photoshop-style manipulation, not solely generative AI.
It additionally has an API and batch processing positioning, which often signifies the product expects critical utilization — moderation groups, platforms, or organizations that course of a whole lot of pictures.
What’s NoteGPT’s AI Picture Detector?
NoteGPT is primarily an all-in-one AI studying assistant. But it surely additionally affords a standalone AI Picture Detector as a free, browser-based software.

The detector web page is positioned round simplicity: add a picture, get a consequence, transfer on. It explicitly mentions recognizing AI-generated or modified images and references widespread turbines like Midjourney, DALL·E, and Steady Diffusion.
The necessity right here is completely different from TruthScan. NoteGPT’s detector reads like one thing designed for fast checks and on a regular basis customers, not enterprise workflows.
TruthScan vs. NoteGPT: AI Picture Detector
Check #1
Verdict: TruthScan detects picture as AI-generated.
AI Chance Rating: 97%

Verdict: NoteGPT detects picture as AI-generated.
AI Chance Rating: 96.16%

Check #2
Verdict: TruthScan detects picture as AI-generated.
AI Chance Rating: 97%

Verdict: NoteGPT detects picture as AI-generated.
AI Chance Rating: 100%

Check #3
Verdict: TruthScan detects picture as AI-generated.
AI Chance Rating: 97%

Verdict: NoteGPT detects picture as human.
AI Chance Rating: 12.78%

Check #4
Verdict: TruthScan detects picture as AI-generated.
AI Chance Rating: 99%

Verdict: NoteGPT detects picture as AI-generated.
AI Chance Rating: 99.34%

Check #5
Verdict: TruthScan detects picture as AI-generated.
AI Chance Rating: 99%

Verdict: NoteGPT detects picture as AI-generated.
AI Chance Rating: 95.05%

Common Rating
The Backside Line
When you plug within the check outcomes, the hole turns into arduous to disregard.
Throughout 5 runs, TruthScan averaged 97.4% and stayed persistently excessive from begin to end. It didn’t simply hit a robust peak — it maintained reliability throughout the set.
NoteGPT averaged 80.67%, which continues to be first rate on paper, and 4 of the 5 outcomes have been excessive. However the distinction is the variance. One check dropped sharply to 12.78%, and that single miss is sufficient to change how you need to use the software in apply.
So the excellence is fairly clear:
- If you need a free, fast first-pass examine, NoteGPT can nonetheless be helpful — so long as you deal with it as triage, not affirmation.
- If you need one thing you’ll be able to depend on extra persistently for actual choices, TruthScan is the stronger possibility based mostly on these scores.
That mentioned, 5 assessments continues to be a small pattern. However inside this set, TruthScan behaved like a software you’ll be able to lean on. NoteGPT behaved like a software you double-check.





