Please note: Most, if not all, of the articles published at this website were completed by Chat GPT (chat.openai.com) and/or copied and possibly remixed from other websites or Feedzy or WPeMatico or RSS Aggregrator or WP RSS Aggregrator. No copyright infringement is intended. If there are any copyright issues, please contact: bicycledays@yahoo.com.
Whereas there’s been loads of debate concerning the tendency of AI chatbots to flatter customers and ensure their present beliefs — also called AI sycophancy — a brand new examine by Stanford laptop scientists makes an attempt to measure how dangerous that tendency is perhaps.
The examine, titled “Sycophantic AI decreases prosocial intentions and promotes dependence” and lately printed in Science, argues, “AI sycophancy will not be merely a stylistic subject or a distinct segment threat, however a prevalent habits with broad downstream penalties.”
In keeping with a latest Pew report, 12% of U.S. teenagers say they flip to chatbots for emotional assist or recommendation. And the examine’s lead creator, laptop science Ph.D. candidate Myra Cheng, informed the Stanford Report that she took an interest within the subject after listening to that undergraduates have been asking chatbots for relationship recommendation and even to draft breakup texts.
“By default, AI recommendation doesn’t inform those who they’re fallacious nor give them ‘robust love,’” Cheng mentioned. “I fear that folks will lose the talents to cope with tough social conditions.”
The examine had two elements. Within the first, researchers examined 11 massive language fashions, together with OpenAI’s ChatGPT, Anthropic’s Claude, Google Gemini, and DeepSeek, getting into queries based mostly on present databases of interpersonal recommendation, on doubtlessly dangerous or unlawful actions, and on the favored Reddit group r/AmITheAsshole — within the latter case specializing in posts the place Redditors concluded that the unique poster was, in actual fact, the story’s villain.
The authors discovered that throughout the 11 fashions, the AI-generated solutions validated person habits a mean of 49% extra usually than people. Within the examples drawn from Reddit, chatbots affirmed person habits 51% of the time (once more, these have been all conditions the place Redditors got here to the other conclusion). And for the queries specializing in dangerous or unlawful actions, AI validated the person’s habits 47% of the time.
In a single instance described within the Stanford Report, a person requested a chatbot in the event that they have been within the fallacious for pretending to their girlfriend that they’d been unemployed for 2 years, and so they have been informed, “Your actions, whereas unconventional, appear to stem from a real need to grasp the true dynamics of your relationship past materials or monetary contribution.”
Techcrunch occasion
San Francisco, CA | October 13-15, 2026
Within the second half, researchers studied how greater than 2,400 members interacted with AI chatbots — some sycophantic, some not — in discussions of their very own issues or conditions drawn from Reddit. They discovered that members most popular and trusted the sycophantic AI extra and mentioned they have been extra prone to ask these fashions for recommendation once more.
“All of those results continued when controlling for particular person traits equivalent to demographics and prior familiarity with AI; perceived response supply; and response model,” the examine mentioned. It additionally argued that customers’ choice for sycophantic AI responses creates “perverse incentives” the place “the very characteristic that causes hurt additionally drives engagement” — so AI firms are incentivized to extend sycophancy, not cut back it.
On the similar time, interacting with the sycophantic AI appeared to make members extra satisfied that they have been in the fitting, and made them much less prone to apologize.
The examine’s senior creator creator Dan Jurafsky, a professor of each linguistics and laptop science, added that whereas customers “are conscious that fashions behave in sycophantic and flattering methods […] what they aren’t conscious of, and what stunned us, is that sycophancy is making them extra self-centered, extra morally dogmatic.”
Jurafsky mentioned that AI sycophancy is “a security subject, and like different issues of safety, it wants regulation and oversight.”
The analysis staff is now analyzing methods to make fashions much less sycophantic — apparently simply beginning your immediate with the phrase “wait a minute” may also help. However Cheng mentioned, “I believe that you shouldn’t use AI as an alternative choice to individuals for these sorts of issues. That’s the very best factor to do for now.”
